MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF POOL

No. DM 81-10-224; CA A27751.

672 P.2d 1231 (1983)

66 Or.App. 74

In the matter of the Marriage of Jack Earl POOL, Respondent, and Dora Mae Pool, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Lytle, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

George Hoselton, Brookings, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were John C. Babin, and Coutrakon, Hoselton & Babin, Brookings.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Wife appeals from a dissolution decree. We understand her contention to be that the trial court failed to make an equitable distribution of the parties' real and personal property.

The record indicates that the trial court intended to divide the marital assets equally. In a preliminary opinion letter, the court awarded husband certain personal property then in the possession of wife. That property was valued by husband, and implicitly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases