HITT v. TRESSLER

No. 83-1235.

7 Ohio St. 3d 11 (1983)

HITT, APPELLEE, v. TRESSLER, APPELLANT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Bodiker & Holland and Mr. Robert J. Holland, for appellee.

Murphey, Young & Smith Co., L.P.A., Mr. David J. Young and Mr. Steven W. Tigges, for appellant.


WISE, J.

Appellant contends that the trial court was without authority to order a new election since such a remedy was not authorized by statute. The appellee argues that the trial court's order for an election is "entirely consistent with law and this court's prior decisions in this case." (Emphasis added.) Both parties rely on footnote 10 of Hitt I: "The next election for city council in Westerville will be in November 1983. Section 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases