BISHOP v. ROSE

No. 82-5256.

701 F.2d 1150 (1983)

James William BISHOP, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Jim ROSE, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Leech, Jr., Atty. Gen. of Tenn., David Himmelreich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Tenn., for respondent-appellant.

Lionel R. Barrett, Jr., William Redick, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner-appellee.

Before LIVELY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.


LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas corpus action the district court found that the State of Tennessee had interferred with the relationship between the petitioner and his attorney to a degree which violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel, and directed that he be released unless the state grants him a new trial. We affirm.

I.

A.

The district court stated the facts as follows:

Facts<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases