DEE v. INSTITUTIONAL NETWORKS CORP.

No. 80 Civ. 3325(JMC).

559 F.Supp. 1282 (1983)

Stacy DEE, Plaintiff, v. INSTITUTIONAL NETWORKS CORPORATION and Jerome M. Pustilnik, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 21, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, New York City (Judith P. Vladeck and Andrew Schulz, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan, New York City (Stacy Wallach, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CANNELLA, District Judge:

Plaintiff's motion for a new trial, 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and defendants' cross-motion for an award of attorney's fees, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, are denied.

FACTS

In an Opinion dated September 10, 1982, the Court found that plaintiff had not established her claim that she was unlawfully terminated by defendant Institutional Networks Corporation ["Instinet"] because of her sex. The Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases