1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 674 P.2d
  5. 674 P.2d 1166 (1983)
 

IN RE SAMUELS/WEINER

No. 80-83; SC 29211.

674 P.2d 1166 (1983)

296 Or. 224

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Stanley M. SAMUELS and David P. WEINER, Accuseds.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 28, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl R. Neil, Portland, argued the cause for the accuseds. With him on the briefs were Daniel H. Skerritt and Lindsay, Hart, Neil, and Weigler, Portland.

John S. Ransom, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief were Ransom, Blackman & Simson, Portland.

Before LENT, C.J., PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this combined disciplinary proceeding,1 the Oregon State Bar, in two separate complaints, charged the accuseds, respectively, with substantially the same acts in violation of part of Canon 5 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.2 The thrust of the four charges against the accuseds is that they failed to exercise independent professional judgment in behalf of a client.

Both the Trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases