OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
This case involves a constitutional challenge to AS 22.25.011 requiring contribution by justices and judges to a retirement system. We find that the lower court erred in declaring the statute unconstitutional on equal protection grounds, and therefore reverse.
AS 22.25.011 states that "[e]ach justice and judge appointed after July 1, 1978, shall contribute seven per cent of the base annual salary received by the justice...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.