1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 571 F.Supp.
  5. 571 F.Supp. 1255 (1983)
 

MIRANDA v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 82-60133.

571 F.Supp. 1255 (1983)

Crescencio S. MIRANDA, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, R.T. Slavin, Ray A. Duffany, and A.A. Negus, jointly and severally, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

October 11, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Provizer, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff.

Brenda Clark, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, T. Patrick Durkin, Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on defendants' motion to compel answers to questions put to plaintiff during a deposition. The question presented is whether statements made by the plaintiff to a polygraph examiner during the post-examination interview, when the polygraph equipment was not in use, are privileged from disclosure in this case under the Michigan Polygraph Examiners Act, M.C.L.A. §§...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases