BARRY WRIGHT CORP. v. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC CORP.

Civ. A. No. 78-485-S.

555 F.Supp. 1264 (1983)

BARRY WRIGHT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald B. Gould, James E. McGuire, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

John A. Nadas, Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, Mass., Joseph J. O'Malley, Norman A. Dupont, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.


FINDINGS, RULINGS AND ORDER

SKINNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Barry Wright Corporation ("Barry") brought this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15 to recover damages for alleged violations of the antitrust laws. Plaintiff claims that defendant Pacific Scientific Corporation ("Pacific") has violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2) and Section 3 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 14). Plaintiff also alleges an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases