1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 8 Ohio
  5. 8 Ohio St. 3d 9 (1983)
 

KING v. K.R. WILSON CO.

No. 83-259.

8 Ohio St. 3d 9 (1983)

KING, APPELLANT, v. K.R. WILSON COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 23, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Connelly, Soutar & Jackson, Mr. William M. Connelly, Mr. James D. Caruso and Mr. Steven P. Collier, for appellant.

Messrs. Eastman & Smith and Mr. M. Donald Carmin, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The issue herein is whether the grant of summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer was correct. We hold it was.

The trial court's basis for granting summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer was that the press had been substantially altered and that there was insufficient proof to hold K.R. Wilson liable for an averred design defect in the unaltered portion of the machine. In Temple v. Wean United, Inc. (1977),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases