1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 664 P.2d
  5. 664 P.2d 1124 (1983)
 

EMPLOYMENT DIV. v. BINGHAM

No. 82-AB-125-A; CA A24395.

664 P.2d 1124 (1983)

63 Or.App. 451

EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Petitioner, v. Gerald R. BINGHAM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 15, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondent.

Katherine Young, The Dalles, argued the cause and filed the brief amicus curiae for Oregon Human Rights Coalition.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.

GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

The Employment Division (Division) seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) concluding that the EAB was unable to determine whether claimant had refused an offer of suitable work without good cause because the Division has not adopted rules to define "suitable work." The order remanded the claim to the Division. We reverse and remand.

Claimant had been an assistant manager of the Division's office at The Dalles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases