HITT v. TRESSLER

No. 82-221.

4 Ohio St. 3d 174 (1983)

HITT, APPELLEE, v. TRESSLER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 27, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Bodiker & Holland and Mr. Robert J. Holland, for appellee.

Murphey, Young & Smith Co., L.P.A., Mr. David J. Young and Mr. Steven W. Tigges, for appellant.


HOLMES, J.

As well as challenging the trial court's determination upholding appellee's election contest and the consequent remedy, appellant poses three arguments questioning the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction. It is axiomatic that courts will resolve questions of subject matter jurisdiction prior to determining the merits of a controversy. Therefore, it is to the jurisdictional questions that we first turn.

The appellant first argues that appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases