ROSQUIST v. JARRAT CONST. CORP.

Civ. A. No. 82-3703.

570 F.Supp. 1206 (1983)

George ROSQUIST, Plaintiff, v. JARRAT CONSTRUCTION CORP., et als., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 6, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No appearance for defendants.


OPINION

STERN, District Judge.

Plaintiff pro se George Rosquist moves pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to vacate the Court's order of November 16, 1982 dismissing his complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction. After having considered the matter pursuant to Rule 78, Fed.R.Civ.P., we have determined that the dismissal order is correct. Accordingly, the motion to vacate the judgment is denied.1

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases