1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 660 P.2d
  5. 660 P.2d 1098 (1983)
 

IN THE MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF PORTELLO

No. 12151; CA A26121.

660 P.2d 1098 (1983)

62 Or.App. 475

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF John Edwin PORTELLO, Appellant, and Ingrid R. Portello, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 6, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcy Leskela, Aloha, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Donald D. Nash, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Purcella, Nash & Hoarfrost, Portland.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal in this domestic relations case was filed more than thirty days after the trial court's order, albeit less than thirty days after the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration of a trial court's final order does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. ORS 19.026. See Credit Bureau v. Marshall, 53 Or.App. 46, 49,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases