BINFORD v. L.W. LICHTENBERGER ESTATE

No. 40 908; CA A24119.

660 P.2d 1077 (1983)

62 Or.App. 439

Thomas BINFORD, Appellant, v. L.W. LICHTENBERGER ESTATE, Defendant, Mrs. L.W. (Lavon) Lichtenberger, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 30, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warde H. Erwin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Paul Gerhardt, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Plaintiff, payee on a promissory note, sought recovery from the estate of the deceased maker of the note1 and from defendant, maker's wife, who also had signed the instrument. Defendant defended on the grounds that plaintiff had given the maker an extension on the note without her knowledge and that plaintiff had failed to make timely presentment. The trial court found that (1) plaintiff had agreed to forebear collection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases