PER CURIAM.
This appeal presents the question whether a non-family third-party creditor may garnish benefits derived from a pension plan which is covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1976). Based upon the rationale set forth in General Motors Corp. v. Buha,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.