1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 700 F.2d
  5. 700 F.2d 1026 (1983)
 

HYDROKINETICS, INC. v. ALASKA MECHANICAL, INC.

No. 82-1123.

700 F.2d 1026 (1983)

HYDROKINETICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALASKA MECHANICAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hudson, Keltner, Smith, Cunningham & Payne, Donald E. Herrmann, Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Godfrey, Decker, McMackin, Shipman, McClane & Bourland, John B. McClane, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before WISDOM, REAVLEY and TATE, Circuit Judges.

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

The question we are asked to decide in this case is whether the exercise of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant under Texas law comports with the basic due process requirements of the United States Constitution. We conclude that it does not, and affirm.

I.

The appellant in this contract dispute, Hydrokinetics, Inc. is a manufacturing concern organized and existing under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases