GAUDIN, Judge.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether petitioners sufficiently spelled out a cause of action under the intentional tort statute, LSA-R.S. 23:1032.
The trial judge did not think so and he maintained two exceptions, terminating the case. Appellants also complain because of the failure of the trial judge to authorize additional pleadings.
For the following reasons, we affirm the maintaining of the exceptions and the refusal to allow...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
