HEINZ PLASTIC MOLD v. CONTINENTAL TOOL

No. 82-1210.

114 Wis.2d 54 (1983)

337 N.W.2d 189

HEINZ PLASTIC MOLD COMPANY, Heinz Lueders and Ruth Lueders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL TOOL CORPORATION, Andre Netz, and A. & W. Mold Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs-appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of Laurence J. Schroepfer and Brazeau, Potter, Wefel & Nettesheim of Wisconsin Rapids, and Robert Handelsman and Emil Shafran and Robbins, Coe, Rubinstein & Shafran, Ltd. of Chicago, IL.

For the defendants-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Charles A. Pollex and Hollman & Pollex of Friendship, and Paul W. Grauer and Paul W. Grauer & Associates of Schaumburg, IL.

Before Gartzke, P.J., Dykman, J. and W.L. Jackman, Reserve Judge.


W.L. JACKMAN, Reserve Judge.

Plaintiffs Heinz Plastic Mold Co. and Heinz and Ruth Lueders appeal from an order dismissing their amended complaint against Continental Tool, Andre Netz and A. & W. Mold Corp. The issues are whether the claims asserted in the Wisconsin action are barred because they were compulsory counterclaims in a federal court action which has proceeded to judgment and whether the claims are otherwise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases