Per Curiam.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether appellant's claim for unemployment compensation benefits was properly denied. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the denial of benefits was premature.
Because appellant was employed by her son, R.C. 4141.01(B) applies. It provides, in relevant part that:
"(3) `Employment' does not include the following services if they are found not subject to the `Federal Unemployment Tax...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
