1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 659 P.2d
  5. 659 P.2d 980 (1983)
 

CITY OF PORTLAND v. MILLER

DA 204306-8012; CA A24232.

659 P.2d 980 (1983)

62 Or.App. 145

CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent, v. Linda Joyce MILLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 2, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul S. Petterson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for loitering to solicit prostitution, in violation of Portland city ordinance 14.24.050. She contends that the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and that there was insufficient evidence to convict. Because we reverse for insufficient evidence, we do not reach the constitutional issues.

The ordinance provides, in pertinent part:

"As used in this section, `prostitution' means an act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases