BASTIAN v. CITY OF TWIN FALLS

No. 13658.

658 P.2d 978 (1983)

104 Idaho 307

Arlon BASTIAN and Una Bastian, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The CITY OF TWIN FALLS, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Petition for Review Denied March 29, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan E. Swanberg, Charles P. Brumbach, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant.

Lloyd J. Webb, Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pederson & Paine, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs-respondents.


BURNETT, Judge.

When land is lawfully used or improved in a way that conflicts with requirements of a subsequently enacted zoning ordinance, the property is said to be nonconforming. From this status flows a limited protection against zoning requirements. Today we examine the limits of such protection.

This appeal focuses upon two questions. (1) If a structure on nonconforming property is enlarged, may a city impose the same landscaping and off-street parking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases