MARGIOTTA v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BD.

No. 82-4375 Summary Calendar.

703 F.2d 931 (1983)

Salvador MARGIOTTA, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine Leary, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Dale G. Zimmerman, Chicago, Ill., General Counsel, Railroad Retirement Bd., Edward S. Hintzke, Evanston, Ill., for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board, Salvador Margiotta, who now receives a disability annuity, contends that the Board incorrectly calculated the amount of the annuity. The issue is one of statutory interpretation. We affirm the Board's reading of the Act.

Section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 231b(f)(3), contains the "social security minimum guaranty provision." It says, in part, that:...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases