1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 142 Cal.App.3d
  5. 142 Cal.App.3d 17 (1983)
 

HUNTINGTON PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. DUNCAN

Docket No. 65177.

142 Cal.App.3d 17 (1983)

190 Cal. Rptr. 744

HUNTINGTON PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DAVID DUNCAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

March 22, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael B. Montgomery and Steven N. Skolnik for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bruce E. Clark for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

POTTER, Acting P.J.

The Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter Agency) appeals from a judgment dismissing its eminent domain proceedings against the owners of a parcel of real property within its redevelopment area after a legal issue trial on the question of whether the property was subject to condemnation.

Evidence at the trial established that defendants, David and Marilyn F. Duncan, are the owners of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases