ROSENBERG v. SO. ORANGE TP.


8 N.J. Tax 7 (1983)

PAUL AND ESTHER ROSENBERG, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan R. Hammer argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein & Hammer, attorneys; Alan R. Hammer of counsel; Michael Pesce on the brief).

David Schechner argued the cause for respondent (Schechner and Targan, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, JOELSON and PETRELLA.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an interlocutory determination in the Tax Court is before us upon a grant by the Supreme Court of leave to appeal.

We affirm substantially for the reasons articulated by Judge Hopkins in his opinion of March 15, 1983, 8 N.J.Tax 1 (Tax.Ct. 1983). It is clear from that that he did not feel bound by the opinion of the assessor either to approve or disapprove. Nor do we think the assessor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases