NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
This diversity case presents questions concerning Connecticut's law of garnishment, see Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-381 (West 1960), and the future advance clause of the Uniform Commercial Code, see N.Y. U.C.C. § 9-301(4) (McKinney Supp.1982). In this case, a judgment creditor from Virginia attempted to garnish an account held as collateral in Connecticut under a security agreement governed by New York law. The District Court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.