CARROLL v. SCATASTI


462 A.2d 1086 (1983)

David CARROLL and Joan Carroll, his wife, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Armand F. SCATASTI and Anthony F. Scatasti, Defendants Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: June 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Pearce, of Truzuskowski, Kipp, Kelleher & Pearce, P.A., Wilmington, for appellants.

Edwin A. Tos, Wilmington, for appellees.

Before HERRMANN, C.J., McNEILLY and CHRISTIE, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

David L. Carroll and John M. Carroll, his wife, plaintiffs in the original action, purchased a renovated row house in the city of Wilmington from Armand F. Scatasti and Anthony F. Scatasti, the defendants in the original action. In the Court of Common Pleas, the Carrolls sought to recover from the Scatastis expenses which they incurred in bringing the house up to Wilmington city code standards. The suit was based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases