1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 656 P.2d
  5. 656 P.2d 842 (1983)
 

FOLIO v. BRIGGS

No. 13270.

656 P.2d 842 (1983)

Bernard FOLIO, Appellant, v. Mitzi S. BRIGGS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

January 20, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nitz & Schofield and James H. Walton, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Goodman, Oshins, Brown & Singer and Richard A. Harris and Kirby R. Wells, Las Vegas, for respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Summary judgment was entered in favor of respondent Mitzi S. Briggs (Briggs) and against appellant Bernard Folio (Folio) pursuant to the district court's perception of the meaning and effect of NRS 463.510(1).1 Since we do not agree with that perception of the statute, we must reverse.

On or about February 15, 1977, Briggs entered into a stock purchase agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases