MAY v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

Nos. 82-AB-347, 82-AB-345, 82-AB-348; CA A24285 (Control), A24286, A24388.

662 P.2d 801 (1983)

63 Or.App. 208

Peter K. MAY, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS, Inc., Respondents. Alan S. Dante, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS, Inc., Respondents. Shawn B. Burke, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND CASCADE STEEL ROLLING MILLS, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff Gerner, Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were David Cash, and Law Offices of Michael B. Dye, Salem.

Wendy B. Comstock, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. With her on the brief were Ronald J. Williams and Williams & Zografos, P.C., Salem.

No appearance for respondent Employment Div.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Claimants were discharged from their employment with Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., for allegedly smoking marijuana while at work. They seek judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) decision denying unemployment insurance benefits for misconduct connected with their work under ORS 657.176 and OAR 471-30-038.1

After they were discharged, claimants applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases