1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 439 So.2d
  5. 439 So.2d 1024 (1983)
 

STATE v. ACOSTA

No. 82-2512.

439 So.2d 1024 (1983)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jorge L. ACOSTA and Rogelio Rodriguez, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 1, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Diane Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Pollack, Komorowski, Headley & Surowiec and John Lipinski, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

NESBITT, Judge.

The state appeals an order dismissing an information for failure of the state to disclose the name of the confidential informant when ordered to do so by the trial court. The information charged Jorge Acosta and Rogelio Rodriguez with actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance and with intent to sell or deliver a controlled substance.

Confidential informant 358 called Sgt. Martinez...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases