IN RE INFINITO


94 N.J. 50 (1983)

462 A.2d 160

IN THE MATTER OF VINCENT J. INFINITO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Bernard F. Conway argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arose as a result of a presentment that was filed by the District XI Ethics Committee against respondent, a member of the bar, based upon respondent's conviction for larceny of property valued at over $500.00 and conspiracy to commit larceny. After hearing on the presentment, the Disciplinary Review Board (Board) accepted the Committee's findings that the respondent had violated DR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases