SHOOSTER v. GELFAND

No. 83-152.

439 So.2d 1000 (1983)

Michael SHOOSTER, Appellant, v. Mark GELFAND and Karen Gelfand, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 26, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan E. Fallik of Jacobson & Gottlieb, Hollywood, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.


GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant sued on a promissory note and notice of the suit was properly given appellees, who neither filed an answer nor made any other appearance in response. The clerk entered defaults against both appellees and the trial court thereafter entered a final judgment. In order to satisfy the judgment, appellant sought post-judgment discovery pursuant to Florida Rules Civil Procedure 1.560, by use of interrogatory. When appellees refused to answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases