PALM v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BD. (CLUETT, PEABODY & CO.)

No. 2597 C.D. 1982.

78 Pa.Commw. 63 (1983)

Tressie V. Palm, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc.), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 24, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Goldman, Thatcher and Miller, for petitioner.

Daniel K. Deardorff, with him William M. Martson, P.C., for respondent, Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc.

Argued September 14, 1983, before Judges ROGERS, MacPHAIL and BARRY, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, October 24, 1983:

Tressie V. Palm has appealed from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board affirming the action of a referee denying her claim for workmen's compensation benefits. The issue is that of whether disability benefits received by the claimant from insurance provided at her employer's expense had the effect of tolling the limitation of Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases