PER CURIAM.
The appellant was adjudicated delinquent after the trial court found him guilty of the crime of robbery. The sole point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence identifying the appellant as the person who committed the crime. The appellant's position is that because he had seven witnesses testifying that he was elsewhere when the crime was committed, against the sole testimony of the victim identifying him as the robber, the evidence was insufficient...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
