STATE v. DURSO


645 S.W.2d 753 (1983)

STATE of Tennessee, Appellant, v. David John DURSO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

February 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Andrew Hoyal, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, for appellant; William M. Leech, Jr., Atty. Gen., Nashville, of counsel.

Robert W. Ritchie, Richard A. Hamra, II, Knoxville, for appellee.


OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

In this Court the sole question presented is whether the provisions of Article VI, Section 14, of the Tennessee Constitution, requiring that fines in excess of fifty dollars be imposed by a jury, may be waived in a felony case. We are of the opinion that such waiver is permissible. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals to the contrary is reversed.

The issue is important in the administration of criminal law in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases