TUCSON UNIFIED SCH. DIST. v. INDUS. COM'N

No. 1 CA-IC 2882.

138 Ariz. 1 (1983)

672 P.2d 953

TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner Employer, Industrial Indemnity Company, Petitioner Carrier, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Earl Estep, Respondent Employee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1983.

Review Denied September 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, P.A. by Donald L. Cross, Larry L. Smith, Phoenix, for petitioners.

James A. Overholt, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Rabinovitz & Dix, P.C. by Bernard I. Rabinovitz, Tucson, for respondents.


OPINION

OGG, Judge.

The issue in this Special Action — Industrial Commission is whether the evidence supports the administrative law judge's determination that respondent employee met his burden of proof in showing that he sustained an injury, in the nature of an occupational disease, arising out of and in the course of his employment. We find that the evidence does support this determination and therefore affirm the award.

Respondent employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases