LEE v. NASH

No. A-8201-00001; A26132.

671 P.2d 703 (1983)

65 Or.App. 538

Debra LEE, Appellant, v. Donald D. NASH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Resubmitted August 3, 1983.

Decided November 9, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied December 2, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marla J. McGeorge, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Richardson, Murphy & Tedesco, Portland.

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

In Banc.


Resubmitted In Banc August 3, 1983.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant, an attorney, entered after plaintiff's amended complaint for invasion of privacy and malpractice was dismissed. She assigns as error that the court granted defendant's motion to dismiss her amended complaint. ORCP 21A(8). We reverse.

As her first count, for invasion of privacy, plaintiff alleges that she and her then husband as co-petitioners retained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases