PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.
We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.