BUDELL v. TODD

No. 99039.

665 P.2d 701 (1983)

105 Idaho 2

Ethel Marie BUDELL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Arthur Lewis TODD and Jane Doe I, husband and wife, Defendants-Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 17, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Michael Sasser, of Hamlin & Sasser, Boise, for defendants-petitioners.

Bradley S. Ford, P.A., Nampa, for plaintiff-respondent.


PER CURIAM:

The defendant in this action has filed a motion to appeal by certification from an interlocutory order, namely an order denying a motion for summary judgment, under Rule 12 of the Idaho Appellate Rules.

I.A.R. 12 was adopted by the Court in 1977 and implemented a procedure similar to an appeal from an interlocutory order from a federal district court to a court of appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases