1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 148 Cal.App.3d
  5. 148 Cal.App.3d 1211 (1983)
 

TEDESCO v. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK

Docket No. 69358.

148 Cal.App.3d 1211 (1983)

196 Cal. Rptr. 534

LOUIS TEDESCO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 14, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William A. Goichman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Zobrist, Vienna & McCullough, Burton V. McCullough, David E. Kronemyer, William Alsup, Portia R. Moore, Jody Y. Jakosa and Morrison & Foerster for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

AMERIAN, J.

This appeal is from the order of dismissal entered after demurrer to the complaint of Louis Tedesco (herein appellant) was sustained without leave to amend.1 We reverse.

FACTS

We accept as true for purposes of this appeal all facts properly pled by appellant. (Thompson v. County of Alameda (1980) 27 Cal.3d 741, 746...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases