OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of attempted murder by a jury; punishment, imposed by the court, was assessed at five years imprisonment. We affirm.
Appellant contends in his sole ground of error that fundamental error existed in the charge to the jury because the jury was authorized to convict him on a theory not alleged in the indictment.
The pertinent portion of the indictment stated that appellant:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
