1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 660 P.2d
  5. 660 P.2d 660 (1983)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF KINSEY

No. OSB 80-49; SC 28742.

660 P.2d 660 (1983)

294 Or. 544

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF William H. KINSEY, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack L. Kennedy, of Kennedy & King, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused.

Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief were Ronald L. Wade and Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty, Portland.

Before LENT, C.J., LINDE, PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS and CARSON, JJ., and JONES, J. Pro Tem.

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Oregon State Bar against William H. Kinsey, who practiced law in a large firm's business department. He has been a member of the Oregon State Bar since 1948. This case interprets disciplinary rules involving the ethical duty of a lawyer when confronted with employment by clients having conflicting interests.

The complaint contains three charges. The first two allege that the accused accepted and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases