IN RE OSTERHOUDT

No. 83-5807.

722 F.2d 591 (1983)

In re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan OSTERHOUDT, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana PHAKSUAN, Movant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 30, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Keker, Keker & Brockett, San Francisco, Cal., for movant-appellant.

Bruce R. Castetter, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Bruce R. Castetter, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief,

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, NORRIS, Circuit Judge, and SCHNACKE, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

The district court properly denied appellant's motion to quash the grand jury subpoena directed to his attorney.

The government stipulated that only the amount, form, and date of payment of legal fees need be disclosed. Appellant recognizes that generally "[t]he identity of an attorney's clients and the nature of his fee arrangements with his clients are not confidential communications protected by the attorney-client privilege." United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases