1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 666 P.2d
  5. 666 P.2d 646 (1983)
 

ROSS v. FIEST

No. 14030.

666 P.2d 646 (1983)

105 Idaho 119

Donald C. ROSS, Claimant-Respondent, v. Richard FIEST, Defendant-Appellant, and Kenneth Byers, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 11, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale L. Luplow, Grangeville, for defendant-appellant.

Paul C. Keeton and John R. Tait, Lewiston, William J. Dee, Grangeville, for claimant-respondent.

BAKES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a determination of the Industrial Commission that defendant appellant Fiest was liable to claimant respondent Ross for workmen's compensation benefits. The sole issue presented is whether an employment relationship existed between Ross and Fiest. We reverse and remand.

Claimant Ross was injured while working as a logger with Fiest. Ross alleged, and the commission found that at the time of the injury Ross was an employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases