1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 456 A.2d
  5. 456 A.2d 798 (1983)
 

SHOCKLEY v. DYER

456 A.2d 798 (1983)

Deborah J. SHOCKLEY and Richard F. Shockley, her husband, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants v. Thomas E. DYER, M.D., Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided January 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard M. Berg (argued) of Howard M. Berg & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, for plaintiffs below, appellants.

Samuel R. Russell (argued) of Biggs & Battaglia, Wilmington, and Randy J. Holland of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Georgetown, for defendant below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, McNEILLY and MOORE, Justices.

McNEILLY, Justice:

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs, Deborah and Thomas Shockley, appeal from the granting of defendant's, Thomas Dyer, M.D., motion for summary judgment by the Superior Court on the ground that plaintiffs' suit was not timely filed. Plaintiffs' principal contention is that their cause of action is not barred by the statute of limitations because the conduct of the defendant was sufficient under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases