WEIGEL v. RON TONKIN CHEVROLET CO.

No. A8106-03272; A25638.

673 P.2d 574 (1983)

66 Or.App. 232

Robbert D. WEIGEL, Respondent, v. RON TONKIN CHEVROLET CO., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 21, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied February 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbee B. Lyon, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Janet C. Neuman, and Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland.

James R. Carskadon, Jr., Milwaukie, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Redman, Carskadon, Knauss & Kelley, Milwaukie.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is an action for fraud and for violation of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 et seq. The trial court granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict on the fraud count. Defendant appeals from a judgment for general and punitive damages following a jury trial. It contends that the trial court erred in (1) entering judgment for plaintiff, (2) instructing the jury and (3) denying its motion for a mistrial. Although...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases