ADKINS v. WATROUS

No. 80-1-188; A26478.

673 P.2d 572 (1983)

66 Or.App. 252

Amaryllis L. ADKINS, Fka Amaryllis L. Wright, Respondent, v. Howard WATROUS and Mavis Watrous, Husband and Wife, Karrie Swanson, Aka Bertha Swanson, and Nemaia Ranches, Ltd., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 21, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Botteri, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Vernon L. Richards, Sandy, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is defendants' second appeal from a trial court order denying their motion to set aside a default judgment. Their first appeal was dismissed because the judgment was not final. Adkins v. Watrous, 57 Or.App. 541, 645 P.2d 591 (1982). The issue is whether there was effective substituted service on the individual defendants (defendants) and on a corporate defendant, Nemaia Ranches, LTD. (Nemaia). We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases