ROBERTS v. AYALA

No. 80-5650.

709 F.2d 520 (1983)

Freeman M. ROBERTS, Verne W. Dahnke, Ray E. Ehly, William A. Floyd, Winton Kemmis, Jerald B. Laird, John C. Maxwell, C.W. Poss, Alexander Rados, William A. Cobb, Jr., William Schmidt, Frank L. Todd, Dale I. Vawter, and William C. Waggoner, each in his respective capacity as Trustee of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund; William A. Cobb, Jr., Verne W. Dahnke, Ray E. Ehly, William A. Floyd, Edwin Kalish, Winton Kemmis, John C. Maxwell, Alexander Rados, Freeman M. Roberts, Dean Sweeney, Jr., Frank L. Todd, Dale I. Vawter, and William C. Waggoner, each in his respective capacity as Trustee of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust; William A. Cobb, Jr., Ray E. Ehly, William A. Floyd, Winton Kemmis, Jerald B. Laird, Donald McCoy, Alexander Rados, Freeman M. Roberts, Dean Sweeney, Jr., Frank L. Todd, Dale I. Vawter and William C. Waggoner, each in his respective capacity Trustee of the Vacation-Holiday Savings Trust; Steve Billy, Kenneth J. Bourguignon, Ray E. Ehly, William A. Floyd, Winton Kemmis, Robert Lytle, Donald MacIntosh, Freeman M. Roberts, William Schmidt, Frank L. Todd, Dale I. Vawter, and William C. Waggoner, each in his respective capacity as Trustee of the Operating Engineers Training Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ralph G. AYALA, Sr. and Ralph G. Ayala, Jr., individually and partners doing business as A-1 Boring Co. and Low Hydro Welding Co., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1983.

Decided June 9, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher M. Laquer, Jett, Clifford & Laquer, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard B. Andrade, Santa Ana, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before ANDERSON, NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court and of this court are controlling authority that appellants' action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (Supp. III 1976), seeking to enforce the terms of a § 8(f) prehire agreement, 29 U.S.C. § 158(f) (Supp. III 1976), may not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on either of the two grounds asserted by appellees in their motion to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases