1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 658 P.2d
  5. 658 P.2d 566 (1983)
 

MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF MEULEMANS

No. 81-1940-NJ-2; CA A24263.

658 P.2d 566 (1983)

61 Or.App. 707

In the matter of the Marriage of William C. MEULEMANS, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Marlys G. Meulemans, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Howser, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Cottle & Howser, P.C., Ashland.

William G. Carter, Medford, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. On the brief were Penny Lee Austin, and Grant, Ferguson & Carter, Medford.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Wife appeals from a dissolution decree. She contends that the trial court erred (1) in failing to award her permanent spousal support, (2) in failing to make adequate provisions for the support of the parties' children, (3) in dividing the marital estate and (4) in denying her attorney fees. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we modify the decree in three respects and affirm it as modified.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases