Defendant's contention that his motion to suppress statements made by him to the police should have been granted is without merit. Defendant's argument that his July 19, 1980 statement violated his right to counsel, since at the time of the statement he was represented by counsel on an unrelated pending charge, is not persuasive. The motion to suppress was made on agreed facts and the record clearly demonstrates that defendant was not represented by counsel on the prior unrelated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
