REHNER v. RICE

No. 77-2409.

717 F.2d 492 (1983)

Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner.

William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief.

Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713, 103 S.Ct. 3291, 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir.1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases